USPS Error: Six-month mail delay resolved for Annapolis resident
A misapplied Return to Sender order stranded bills and a ballot until October 20, according to a USPS spokesperson.
By Jason Cooper ·

USPS confirmed on October 20 that it cancelled a Return to Sender order affecting the address of Maggie Rauh in Annapolis, ending a six-month disruption to her mail service. The agency stated the order had been in place since April 7 and that current mail will now be routed to the local office for delivery. A spokesperson apologized for the inconvenience while noting the investigation into the matter continues.
The error caused first-class mail, including bank statements and utility bills, to be returned to senders. Rauh, who has lived at the home since 2017, reported receiving no mail between April and late October. She visited the Legion Avenue post office approximately six times during that period, where staff explained they lacked the authority to reverse the status change. They could only accept a request that she had moved, not that she had stayed.
Consumer protection attorney Peter Holland assisted Rauh after she contacted him. He reviewed envelopes marked with phrases such as Moved, Left No Address and Unable to Forward. Holland noted the difficulty in identifying which specific action triggered the system flag. He filed a complaint with the USPS Office of Inspector General in August. The OIG acknowledged the complaint and referred it to USPS Delivery Control, but the issue persisted until the recent cancellation.
USPS explained that carriers can initiate these orders without direct customer confirmation under specific circumstances. The agency stated this typically happens if a property appears vacant or if mail remains in a box too long to prevent theft or overflow. Rauh disputed these conditions, stating she never moved and her mailbox was not overstuffed. The agency has not yet identified the specific individual who entered the order.
The disruption affected Rauh’s voting process. Her mail-in ballot was returned to the sender because the system indicated she had moved without a forwarding address. She requested a replacement ballot but expressed concern that she may need to vote provisionally. Rauh also noted that late fees on missed payments were waived by her bank and BGE after they identified the returned mail issue.
An April confrontation with a carrier may have preceded the formal error. Rauh described an exchange regarding her dog, where the carrier stated she had the ability to make the mail disappear for six months. A note appeared in the mailbox the following day stating the mail would be restored. Rauh does not know if the two events are linked, and USPS has not established a connection.
USPS said the investigation is looking into who placed the order, why it was placed, and how the issue was not discovered earlier. The agency’s Customer Relations department oversees complaints related to delivery problems. Callers to the USPS hotline receive a file number, and the complaint is routed to the local office for a response within two business days.
For residents experiencing similar issues, USPS advises checking with senders to see if mail was returned and for what reason. Keeping copies of returned envelopes and complaint numbers can aid in follow-up. The agency directs customers to call 1-800-275-8777 to report delivery problems.
Source: WMAR-TV





